copy, judgment of Sir Joseph Zemg.C.J.
IN THE SUP AME COURT OF HONG KO
(4)
47
FULL COURT.
REX
CHENG KW K YAU : Murder.
Questions of law reserved.
JUDGMENT.
I agree generally with the judgment which
has just been delivered by my learned brother. I
should like to add another reason why, in my opinion,
the evidence objected to is admissible.
erhaps
this additi onal reason is only a restatement from a
·
different point of view, of the reasons already given.
Whe ther one fact tends to prove ano ther
is, speaking broadly, a matter of common mental processes.
As it is put in Halsbury's Laws ɗ England, Volume
13, at page 439, in paragraph 611, "in the vast
"majority of cases the law will accept as evidence
"tho se matters which are indicated as such by the
"ordinary course of human experience." Some matters
which ordinary reasoning would admit are definitely
excluded by the rules of legal evidence for various
sound reasons, e.g., involuntary confessions because
of the great risk that they may not be true, bad
character because of its dangerously rejudicial
nature and small evidentiary value towards proving
the single act alleged, and hearsay because it is not
on œ th, cannot be tested by cross-examination, opena
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.